编者按：本文来自微信公众号奇偶派（ID:jioupai），作者：李好，编辑：钊，创业邦经授权发布
Editor by: This paper is from the microfiche public (ID:jioupai), author: Yoo Li, editor:, State of Entrepreneurship is authorized to publish
2020年万维网之父蒂姆·伯纳斯·李在接受《名利场》杂志采访时表达了对当前互联网表失望的看法，他说“互联网的精神应该是去中心化的，但在一些公司已经把互联网当成了垄断联盟”。
Tim Burnas Lee, the father of the 2020 World Wide Web, expressed disappointment with the current Internet chart in an interview with the Triumph magazine, stating that “the spirit of the Internet should be decentralized, but some companies have already used the Internet as a monopoly union”.
最近，互联网具有垄断性人尽皆知，国内对阿里罚款182亿和对美团34.42亿的反垄断处罚时，微博不断有人喊出“天下苦互联网大厂久矣”。
Recently, when the Internet was known to be monopolistic, with domestic fines of $18.2 billion for Ali and antimonopoly penalties of $3.442 billion for the United States Regiment, Weibo continued to be called “the long-sought Internet factory”.
在国内反垄断法实行的同时，人们也开始密切讨论如何才能回收互联网大厂的权力，使其不能垄断整个互联网。
At the same time as domestic antimonopoly laws have been introduced, there has also been a close discussion on how to recover the power of large Internet plants so that they cannot monopolize the Internet as a whole.
1月7日，美国听证会上Bitfury Group首席执行官Brian Brook向在场的议员们科普了Web3.0的概念。
On 7 January, at the United States hearing, Brian Brook, Chief Executive Officer of Bitfury Group, presented the concept of Web3.0 to the parliamentarians present.
Brian Brook认为，互联网1.0时代用户只可获取信息，不能够编辑信息，因此Web1.0的特点为只读。
Brian Brooks argues that Internet 1.0 users have access only to information and cannot edit information, so Web1.0 is characterized as read-only.
Web2.0时代，用户对于互联网信息是可读写的，例如我们使用的微信公众号、微博等，人人都可成为创作者。
In the Web 2.0 era, users are able to read and write about information on the Internet, such as micro-publics, micro-blogging and so on, and everyone can be a creator.
但这也衍生出一个问题，平台权力过大，用户成为一个个模糊不清可以被任意拿捏的单一数据存在。
But there is also a problem that arises when the platform is too powerful and the user becomes a single data that is vague and can be squeezed at will.
甚至，美国前总统特朗普在twitter发表对互联网公司不利的言论后，twitter可直接封杀美国前总统在社交媒体上的账户。
Even the former President of the United States, Trump, was able to block directly the accounts of the former President of the United States in social media after twitter had made statements against Internet companies.
Web2.0时代，用户对于互联网的在线身份，更像从中心化公司租借，因此账户容易受到黑客攻击、操作、审查、丢失、封杀等风险。
In the Web 2.0 era, the online identity of users of the Internet was more like a lease from a centralized company, making accounts vulnerable to the risks of hacking, operating, censoring, losing, blocking, etc.
在此基础上，Brian Brook给出了Web3.0的定义：可读写、同时可拥有。
On this basis, Brian Brooks gives the definition of Web3.0: read-write, and possessable at the same time.
在Brian Brook进行了一番Web3.0的普及后，出席听证会的议员中有人当众喊出，必须保证Web3.0发生在美国。
Following the popularization of Brian Brooke's Web3.0, it was announced in public that Web3.0 had to be guaranteed in the United States.
Web3.0到底是什么样的时代？它为什么这么重要？Web3.0是“万能药”吗？
What is the age of Web3.0? Why is it so important? Is Web3.0 a "one-size-fits-all" drug?
我们试图以案例的形式让大家理解这三个问题。
We have tried to make these three issues understood in the form of cases.
在理解Web3.0之前，我们需要先明白近年来很火的一个概念DAO。
Before understanding Web3.0, we need to understand a concept that has been burning in recent years, DAO.
很少有人意识到，区块链中的应用——Token（代币），可能是近些年来最伟大的制度创新，它超越股份制，可能真正将互联网由信息时代转变为价值时代。
Few people realize that the application in the block chain — Token (demons) — may be the greatest institutional innovation in recent years, transcending the stock system and possibly truly transforming the Internet from an information age to a value age.
前不久，币圈发生了一件融资界离奇事件，在推特上一个名为ConstitutionDAO的组织发表推特称，将参与竞拍苏富比展出的1787年《美国宪法》正式版中其中一份，该宪法异常珍贵，全世界仅存13份，由于我们资金不足，因此只能采取众筹的方式。
Not long ago, there was a strange financing incident in the currency circle, in which an organization called ConstitutionDAO tweeted that it would be participating in the competition for one of the official editions of the 1787 United States Constitution displayed by Sufubi, which is extremely valuable and only 13 in the world, and which, because of our lack of funds, can only be raised in public.
消息发布后，大量网友在推特上嘲讽，“想要竞拍《美国宪法》需要拿到苏富比的入场券，这场拍卖的入场券最少为1000万美元。”
After the news was released, a large number of netizens taunted on Twitter that “to compete for the United States Constitution would require Sufubi's entry ticket, which would be a minimum of $10 million for the auction”.
ConstitutionDAO没有资金却有一脑子想法，在推特向推特网友喊话称，自己现在想要众筹竞拍《美国宪法》，竞拍结束后所有捐款人将可投票决定《美国宪法》的展览路线，以及获得此次展览后具体分红。
With no funds, ConstitutionDAO has a mind-brained idea, tweeting to its Twitter friends that it now wants to win a public contest for the United States Constitution, and that all donors will be able to vote on the route of the United States Constitution exhibition after the competition is over, as well as the specific red mark that will be given to the exhibition.
为了保持自己说话的真实性，Constitution DAO领导人在Juicebos上推出了一个众筹入口，并且利用区块链技术将自己的权利“去中心化”。
In order to preserve the veracity of their statements, the leadership of Constitution DAO has launched a crowd-sourcing portal on Juicebos and has “de-centralized” its rights using block chain technology.
网友在捐款后也将凭借捐款数量，获得不同数量的凭证代币“people”，此凭证是具有唯一性并不可篡改的代币，它代表众筹过后分红的比例与投票权，也是参与过竞拍《美国宪法》竞拍唯一证明。
On the basis of the amount of the contribution, the online users will also receive a different amount of money in the form of a “people's” token, which is unique and unalterable, represents the share and voting right of the public to raise the bonus, and is the only proof of their participation in the competition for the United States Constitution.
消息发出后，短短72小时有17000人参与捐款，共筹集资金超过4000万美元，由于都是自主想要购买《美国宪法》，大部分投资者在宣传与推广此次捐款项目后自主扮演公关、营销、网站开发等角色。
As a result of the information received, 17,000 people participated in 72 hours, raising funds totalling over $40 million, and since they wanted to buy the United States Constitution on their own, most investors played their own role in public relations, marketing, website development, etc., following the promotion and promotion of the donation project.
两天后，随着ConstitutionDAO转发苏富比拍卖美国宪法副本的新闻公告，并同时宣布参与此次拍卖和筹款，大量用户蜂拥而至，来自近一百个DAO的成员通过在这条推文上发表评论和转发，使这条推文病毒式传播。
Two days later, with the transmission of a press release from Constitution DAO to Sufubi for the auction of a copy of the United States Constitution and the announcement of participation in the auction and fund-raising, a large number of users arrived, and members from nearly 100 DAOs spread the tweet virus by commenting on and transmitting it.
据奇偶派统计，除去前两天的爆炸式增长，ConstitutionDAO每天筹集捐款大约 200 万美元，截止苏富比拍卖《美国宪法》时，筹款金额到达4700万美元。
In addition to the explosive growth of the previous two days, according to the Piccupant, Constitution DAO raised approximately US$ 2 million per day, reaching US$ 47 million by the time Sufubi auctioned the United States Constitution.
不过，受到万众瞩目的ConstitutionDAO此次并未如愿，来自芝加哥的首富ken Griffin以微弱优势击败了ConstitutionDAO。
However, the popular Constitution DAO failed this time, and the richest Ken Griffin from Chicago defeated the Constitution DAO with a slight advantage.
说来有趣，ConstitutionDAO失败的重要原因正是它在筹款过程中公开透明，出价底线被竞争者摸清，随后ConstitutionDAO向每位出资者进行了退款申请。
Interestingly, the important reason for the failure of ConstitutionDAO was that it was open and transparent in the fund-raising process, and that the bottom line of the bid was spelled out by competitors, and the ConstitutionDAO subsequently applied to each contributor for a refund.
事情结束后，纽约时报、BBC对ConstitutionDAO组织进行了大肆报道，只是他们的报道并不在于苏富比展示中《美国宪法》拍卖的输赢，而是将聚光灯对焦在了ConstitutionDAO这个组织上。
After that, the New York Times, BBC, gave a lot of coverage to the Constitution DAO organization, except that their story did not lie in the winner and the winner of the US Constitution auction in Sufuby's show, but in the focus of the spotlight on the Constitution DAO organization.
纽约时报评价，“不到一周时间， 区块链技术将17000位素未谋面的人聚集在一起，在共同努力下完成同一个目标，这太不可思议了”。
The New York Times evaluates that “in less than a week, block chain technology brings together 17,000 people who have never met before, working together to achieve the same goal is incredible”.
苏富比也评价称，“我们对艺术品筹款需要半年的时间才能达到4000万的资金，而ConstitutionDAO却仅仅用了一周”。
Sufubi also assessed that “it takes us six months to raise funds for works of art to reach $40 million, while ConstitutionDAO takes only one week”.
就连ConstitutionDAO的创始人也在推特上说，“我们众筹购买《美国宪法》的项目失败了，但我觉得这没关系，我们已经创造了历史，没有一家自治组织能够在短短一周时间里筹集到4700万美元，我们利用区块链技术第一次做到了自治组织大额融资，而所有的一切都只是来自于一个拍卖《美国宪法》的想法”。
Even the founder of ConstitutionDAO on Twitter said, “We have failed in our project to raise money for the United States Constitution, but I think it's okay. We have made history. No self-governing organization has been able to raise $47 million in just one week. For the first time, using block chain technology, we have achieved substantial financing for the self-governing organization, all of which comes from an idea of auctioning the United States Constitution”.
无独有偶，在ConstitutionDAO自治组织发布众筹之前，一个名为“Krause House DAO”的“去中心化”组织在Opensea上发行NFT，目标是筹款1000个ETH（折合人民币2400万元），去购买一只NBA球队。
Uniquely, a “decentralized” organization called Krause House DAO released NFT on Opensea prior to the launch of the autonomous organization ConstitutionDAO, with the objective of raising 1,000 ETHs (equivalent to 24 million yuan) to buy an NBA team.
虽然2400万元现在还达不到NBA球形一年的伙食费与日常开销，但这个项目展开后自治组织筹款速度惊人，仅一天时间便筹款400枚ETH，折合人民币近1000万元。
Although 24 million yuan is now less than the NBA spherical meal bill and daily expenditure for one year, the self-government organization raised 400 ETHs in just one day, equivalent to nearly 10 million yuan.
2008年随着第一枚比特币的出现，区块链这个概念被代入人们的眼中，这是人类历史上第一次不依靠人力，完全靠机器自主的算力达成的第一笔交易。
In 2008, with the advent of the first bitcoin, the concept of block chains was introduced into the eyes of people, the first transaction in human history to be made entirely by machine-owned arithmetic for the first time.
2011年，ETH出现在人们视野中，他像是比特币的改良版，ETH完全靠代码自主运行，可以理解为一种电子合同，合同中条约信息完全靠代码决定而非人类，ETH创始人还给它取了个响亮的名字——智能合约。
In 2011, ETH appeared in the eyes of people, like an improved version of Bitcoin, which operated entirely on its own by code, understood as an electronic contract in which treaty information was entirely code-based rather than human, and the founder of ETH gave it a loud name — a smart contract.
DAO自治组织便是一群不依靠人力，完全靠智能合约完成众筹的组织，在众筹时人们依靠计算机代码将组织领头人“去中心化”，让组织的动向依靠投票决定。
The DAO self-governing organization is a group of organizations that do not rely on human resources and that rely exclusively on intellectual contracts, and that rely on computer codes to “centralize” the organization's leader, leaving the organization's movement to be determined by voting.
以拍卖《美国宪法》的ConstitutionDAO为例，在ConstitutionDAO拍卖之前，在推特上告知网民，自己将把捐款地址放入类似“区块链保险箱”的账户中，如果自己想要动这笔钱，需要最少9个领导者同时签上他们的姓名。
In the case of Constitution DAO, which auctions the United States Constitution, Internet users were informed on Twitter, prior to the Constitution DAO auction, that they would place the donation address in an account similar to the block chain safe, and that if they wanted to move the money, at least nine leaders would have to sign their names at the same time.
其次，在整个移动账户资金与签名的过程中，所有数据均可在ETH浏览器中查看，全球的网民只要能够登上美国网络的人，都可以实时查看这笔钱的网络动向，人们可以完全信任代码网络。
Second, throughout the process of mobile account funds and signatures, all data can be viewed in the ETH browser, and Internet users around the world can view the movement of the money in real time, and people can trust the code network.
这笔钱就相当于一个全世界都能看到的银行账户，他的每一笔交易记录都清楚地记录在区块链上。
This money is equivalent to a bank account that can be seen throughout the world, and every record of his transactions is clearly recorded in the block chain.
由于ConstitutionDAO并没有拍卖成功，我们并不能看到《美国宪法》捐款所获得的People（代币）在实际投票中的表现。
Since ConstitutionDAO did not succeed in the auction, we cannot see the performance of People (demonstration) in the actual vote, as a result of the United States Constitution donation.
但我们可以举个例子，例如奇偶派在《美国宪法》捐款时投入了100万美元，我们按照众筹款项4700万美元计算，奇偶派在《美国宪法》中的投票权为47分之一。
But we can give one example, for example, when the Puppets contributed $1 million to the United States Constitution, and we calculated the Puppets' voting rights in the United States Constitution at $47 million on the basis of a public fund-raising package of 47 per cent.
若当《美国宪法》在投票展览时到底去“华盛顿”展览，还是去“西雅图”展览上，奇偶派都手握47分之一的话语权。
If the United States Constitution were to go to the “Washington” exhibition at the time of the voting exhibition, or to the “Siato” exhibition, the phantoms would have a voice of one in 47.
并且《美国宪法》在经过展览后，回收门票若为1000万美元，奇偶派也可从中获得47分之一的收益。
And if, after the exhibition, the United States Constitution recovers $10 million, the phantoms also receive one-seventh of the proceeds.
ConstitutionDAO利用区块链技术，获得了17000人的信任与筹资款项，在拍卖途中也只需要一个人便可完成80%的工序。如今看来，DAO这个新概念依然具有无法想象的潜力。
Using block chain technology, ConstitutionDAO has gained trust and funding for 17,000 people, and only one person is needed to complete 80% of the process on the way to the auction. Now, the new concept of DAO still has unimaginable potential.
ConstitutionDAO在完成这一壮举后，大量交易所上线了《美国宪法》的拍卖凭证以记录这一历史性事件，并把它成为Web3.0的开端——完全可信任的自治组织形式。
After completing this campaign, the ConstitutionDAO entered a large number of exchanges to record the historic event with the United States Constitution auction documents and to make it the beginning of Web3.0 — a fully trusted form of self-government.
不过，Web3.0真的到来了吗？推特创始人多杰西做了一款实验证明，现在只是在WEB2.0与Web3.0的过度阶段，Web3.0依然只是概念。
But is Web3.0 really here? The founder of Twitter, Dodjsi, has done an experiment to prove that Web3.0 is still a concept only at the transition stage between WEB 2.0 and Web3.0.
前段时间，NFT这个概念火遍了娱乐圈。前有林俊杰在Opensea花50万购买NFT资产“加密猴”来布置自己的MANA土地空间，后有周杰伦INS站台“加密熊”，将数字藏品NFT话题彻底引爆。
Earlier, the concept of NFT was rife in the entertainment business. Before Lim Junjie spent half a million dollars on NFT assets in Opensea to set up his own MANA landspace, followed by Jaylen INS station, “Cypted Bears”, which blew the digital collection of NFT.
Opensea是一款数字藏品NFT交易平台，用户可以在此平台创建和交易NFT，其中数字藏品可以是你的自拍，可以是你的画作，甚至可以是你的QQ头像。
Opensea is a digital collection of NFT trading platforms where users can create and trade NFTs, where the digital collections can be your own picture, your drawings, or even your QQ image.
今年7月仅一个月是时间，Opensea在数字藏品NFT的脉脉中，交易额达3.5亿美元。Opensea在发布消息后，区块链投资团队A16z对Opensea领投一亿美元，此后Opensea还传出近期可能上市纳斯达克的消息。
One month last, in July, Opensea was trading at $350 million in the veins of the digital collection NFT. After Opensea released the news, the block chain investment team A16z received $100 million from Opensea, and after that, Opensea also reported news of a possible near-term listing of Nasdak.
而Opensea也被市场称为Web3.0的原生应用，因为Opensea在注册过程中除了使用邮箱、电话号登录外，区块链钱包也可以直接登录Opensea。
Opensea, on the other hand, is also a primary application known by the market as Web3.0, as Opensea can directly log into Opensea's wallets during the registration process, in addition to using mailboxes, telephone numbers and login.
使用区块链钱包登录被成为Web3.0的原因在于，钱包登录所有资产可储存在钱包中，而不用将数字资产储存在官方服务器中。这样即使平台倒闭，记得钱包账户密码也依然可以找回自己的数字资产和NFT。
The use of block chain wallets to log in became Web3.0 because wallets can store all assets in wallets instead of storing digital assets on official servers. Remember that wallet account codes can recover their digital assets and NFTs even if the platform collapses.
不过Moxie 创始人并不相信Opensea是Web3.0的应用。
But the founder of Moxy does not believe that Opensea is a Web3.0 application.
Moxie 在Opensea上创建了一个NFT，并故意对NFT中的代码进行编程，使其在不同平台上看起来的图案不同。（取决于网站IP）
Moxie created an NFT on Opensea and deliberately programmed the code in the NFT to make it look different on different platforms. (Depending on website IP)
最初在Moxie在Opensea上架这款NFT后，在自己的钱包中与Opensea中都可以看到这款NFT的图像。
The image of the NFT was initially seen in Moxy's wallet and in Opensea after Moxy took up the NFT at Opensea.
不过一周后，Opensea官方声称将下架Moxie的NFT，声称Moxie违反了他们的服务条款。
However, a week later, Opensea's official claim that the next Moxy's NFT would be in violation of their terms of service.
虽然Opensea声称从官网下架了Moxie的NFT，但Moxie依然可以在钱包中看到自己的NFT，只是在Opensea中被永久下架，此平台不能够在买卖Moxie的NFT了。
Although Opensea claimed to have set up Moxy's NFT from the official network, Moxy could still see his NFT in his wallet, but was permanently set aside in Opensea, and the platform could no longer buy and sell Moxy's NFT.
这就好比我们写文章时，微博在客户端行把我们的言论删除，但在本地记录与草稿中都还是有我们发言的观点。
It's like when we write, when we're on the client side of Twitter, we delete our words, but we still have our point of view in both the local records and the drafts.
Moxie 深入研究后发现，他使用的钱包应用程序并没有真正显示他在以太坊区块链上的账户内容。相反，他的钱包应用程序依赖于一个 API 来检查哪些 NFT 与哪个区块链账户有关，而这个 API 正是 OpenSea API。
Moxie's in-depth study found that the wallet application he was using did not really show his account content on the Ether block chain. Instead, his wallet application relied on an API to check which NFT related to which block chain account the API was OpenSea API.
Moxie方面表示，“这种感觉就像 Web 2.0 的重现。一个强大的平台在未经用户同意的情况下，成功地没收/删除了他账户中的数据和资产”。
The Moxie side said, “This feeling is like the re-emergence of Web 2.0. A powerful platform has succeeded in confiscating/depositing data and assets from his account without the user's consent”.
不过，发生在 Moxie 身上的事情与 Web 2.0 平台决定删除用户文件或列表时发生的事情之间有一个本质的区别。
However, there is a fundamental difference between what happens in Moxie and what happens when the Web 2.0 platform decides to delete a user file or list.
如果 Moxie 使用一个不同的应用程序，直接在区块链上检查他的 NFT 的状态，那么他可以看到 NFT 仍然存在。若Moxie换个平台，新平台一样会显示他的变幻NFT，只是在Opensea由于管理员的阻止，Moxie的NFT才不被显现。
If Moxie uses a different application to check his NFT status directly on the block chain, he can see that NFT still exists. If Moxy changes the platform will show his variant NFT, as will the new platform, only if it is prevented by the administrator in Opensea.
通过Moxie的实验我们可以知道，Web3.0还只是在实验中并没有到来，而现在的情形更像是Web2.5的过渡期。
We can see from the Moxy experiment that Web3.0 is just not in the experiment, and the situation is more like the transition period of Web2.5.
Web3.0在应用端，区块链钱包、defi、去中心化交易所、智能合约等Web3.0应用在区块链中蓬勃发展。
At the end of the application, Web3.0, the block chain wallet, defi, decentralized exchange, smart contracts, etc., were used to flourish in the block chain.
但在现实社会中，人们因要求生活的便捷性，以及对互联网大厂的路径依赖，大多数人都选择对Web2.0的妥协。
In real societies, however, most people have chosen to compromise on Web 2.0 because of the ease with which they want to live and their dependence on access to large Internet plants.
若一定要说当前互联网处在什么时代，Web2.5可能是最好的形容。
Web2.5 may be the best description if we must say what the current era of the Internet is.
互联网也许是本世纪最重要的发明。在过去的二十年里，它改变了社会中信息流的基本性质：媒体、政治、新闻、教育、社会互动等等。然而，即使经济活动越来越多地从现实转向网络，我们的在线身份仍然缺乏真正的所有权，仍然在平台内被随意查看。
The Internet is perhaps the most important invention of the century. Over the past two decades, it has changed the fundamental nature of the flow of information in society: the media, politics, journalism, education, social interaction, and so on.
区块链是一台特殊计算机，任何人都可以访问，无人可以拥有。在我们的思考中，Web3.0的是互联网基于区块链技术所设计的新一代价值互联网。
Block chains are a special computer that anyone can access, and no one can own. In our thinking, Web3.0 is a new generation of value Internets based on block chain technology.
而链接互联网与现实之间的距离便是TOKEN（代币），TOKEN对于用户就像是代码与计算机的配置——他们一种是人对电脑的编程方案，一种是社会对人之间的激励方案。
The distance between linking the Internet and reality is Token, which is like the configuration of a user with a code and a computer — one of the programming options of a person to a computer and one of the incentives of a society to a person.
2008年比特币诞生之初，谁也没有想到简单的通过代币链接用户的方案在全球范围内会引起巨大的震动。后来，比特币、以太坊的成功证明，通过代币、凭证给予人激励措施是简单可行的。
At the beginning of Bitcoin’s birth in 2008, no one thought that simply linking users through tokens would cause a massive worldwide shock. Later, the success of Bitcoin and Etheria proved that giving people incentives through tokens and vouchers was simple and feasible.
人们越来越有感知的是，为同一个梦想发布代币并形成自治组织，利用人性的弱点“金钱激励”“欲望的贪婪”“渴望机遇”“害怕失去”等情绪，会影响人类对整个项目的贡献程度。
It is increasingly felt that the publication of a token for the same dream and the formation of an autonomous organization, taking advantage of such sentiments as the human weakness of “money incentives” of “the greed of desire” and “the fear of losing” of opportunity, affect the extent to which human beings contribute to the project as a whole.
作为正常人，人类本身基因中就设定了寻找更多经济回报，将事件公开透明等基因。
As normal people, the genes of human beings themselves are set to look for more economic returns, such as open and transparent events.
例如在第一个案例中，ConstitutionDAO使用区块链功能将17000人聚拢在一起，同时完成一个目标，短短一周时间筹款4700万美元。
In the first case, for example, ConstitutionDAO used block chain functions to bring together 17,000 people while at the same time completing a goal of raising $47 million in just one week.
甚至在达成目标时，用户会自发的组成公关、营销、市场等自治人员，以加快实现目标的速度。
Even when goals are reached, users automatically form autonomous personnel, such as public relations, marketing, marketing, etc., in order to accelerate the achievement of the goals.
在这个事件中，将大家众筹联系在一起的是捐款所用的代币people，这是区块链中极为重要的一环。
In this event, we are all linked to the money people use for donations, which is an extremely important link in the chain of blocks.
ConstitutionDAO捐款中所发售的“people”凭证将整个组织化为去中心化，没有核心领头人的“分布式利益共同体”。
The certificate of “people” sold in the contribution of ConstitutionDAO will decentralize the organization as a whole, without the “distributed community of interests” of the core leader.
数以千万基计的人们由于分红、金钱、荣誉自发走在一起，朝着同一目标前进，最终的动力在于让自己手中的TOKEN获得成功，价值上升。
Tens of millions of base-sized people have moved on to the same goal through the spontaneous movement of dividends, money and honours, ultimately driven by the success and value of the Token in their hands.
除此之外，Web2.0的创建也并没有对人们提供一个原生身份，正因如此我们才需要在每个网站都注册一个账户，并把自己的关键信息储存在平台服务器中。
Besides, the creation of Web 2.0 does not provide people with an original identity, which is why we need to register an account on each website and store key information on the platform server.
如果是在早期，账号密码的形式可能正合适，但国内目前有着数十亿网民，用户名和密码不再是互联网中的安全模式，并且在互联网上每个人至少需要50个密码左右，来管理自己的软件，软件间还互相形成数据孤岛，导致用户体验明显下降。
If it were at an early stage, the account code might be in the right form, but there are currently billions of Internet users in the country, user names and passwords are no longer a secure mode in the Internet, and each person on the Internet needs at least 50 passwords to manage its own software, and there is an interlocking data silo, resulting in a marked decline in user experience.
Web3.0就是想要解决身份原生的问题，在第二案例中Moxie虽然在Opensea中创建数字藏品NFT被下架，但只要Moxie去其他NFT平台，就能够找到丢失的NFT并上架另一个平台。
Web3.0 is intended to solve the problem of identity origin, and in the second case, Moxy, while creating a digital collection of NFTs in Opensea was set aside, as long as Moxy went to other NFT platforms, it would be possible to locate lost NFTs and mount another platform.
并且Moxie不需要在其他网站注册成为用户，只用扫描区块链钱包便可进入网站。在Web3.0中所有身份都是互联互通的，除了需要钱包授权，其他应用均可以不授权进入。
And Moxy does not need to register as a user on other sites, and access to the site is only possible with a scanned block chain wallet.
在传统企业亚马逊中，高层可以决定谁可以从他们的数据库中读取和写入，以及谁可以看到其中的哪部分，并且他们可以单独更改此数据库。事实证明，这也是亚马逊在世界范围内的权力来源。
In the traditional Amazon, the higher echelons can decide who can read and write from their databases, and who can see which parts of them, and they can change the database individually. This has proved to be a source of power for the Amazon worldwide.
Web3.0像是社区在互联网身份中一次独立思考，在这次思考中区块链、数字资产、去中心化金融、智能合约、去中心化组织和身份互联，这些区块链工具成为了人类共同协作的新形势。
Web3.0 is an independent reflection of community identity on the Internet, in which clusters, digital assets, de-centralized finance, smart contracts, de-centralized organizations and identity connections become new situations in which people work together.
不过，Web3.0的范畴和内涵远不止于这些，它包含了区块链中所衍生出来的这些应用，并组成一个新的互联网协作方式。
However, the scope and content of Web3.0 goes far beyond this, encompassing these applications derived from the block chain and forming a new form of Internet collaboration.
其互联网平台的特点包括，区块链中的读、写、拥有信息，成为价值互联网的货币层，不需要互联网平台身份验证，对销售身份数据做出反击，发展新的激励模式，使合作便的简单。
The features of its Internet platform include reading, writing and owning information in the block chain, becoming a currency layer of value to the Internet without the need for Internet platform identification, countering the sale of identity data, developing new incentive models and making cooperation simple.
不过现在，Web3.0还处于过渡阶段，在Web2.0时代的巨头的联合下，第三代互联网还未有出头之日。
However, web3.0 is still in transition, and the third generation of the Internet has not yet come to fruition, under the umbrella of the giants of the Web 2.0 era.
电影《黑天鹅》里有一段话，“历史，是跳跃着前进的，它总在我们不经意间跳上我们无法想象的断层”。
In the film Black Swan, there is a saying, “History is a leap forward, and it always jumps on a fault that we can't imagine by accident”.
Web3.0到底是什么？从目前区块链的发展来看很难有人说的清楚。
What exactly is Web3.0? It's hard to be clear from the current development of the block chain.
但每当历史进程受到阻碍时，总会有一大堆概念冒出来推着社会的进程向前发展，互联网的出现是这样，区块链的出现也是这样。
But whenever historical processes are blocked, there are a lot of concepts that emerge to push society forward, as is the emergence of the Internet and the emergence of block chains.
ConstitutionDAO的出现，看似是互联网世界中的一场闹剧，其实可能已经在慢慢潜移默化地将同一个理想自治社区的概念刻入人心。
The emergence of ConstitutionDAO, which appears to be a farce in the Internet world, may have been slowly and tacitly imbued with the notion of the same ideal self-governing community.
Moxie的实验说明Web3.0还处于发展阶段，整个过程中个人身份与钱包依然可被互联网大厂所抹除。
The Moxie experiment shows that Web3.0 is still in its development stage and that personal identities and wallets can still be erased from Internet laboratories throughout the process.
现在Web3.0依然在不成熟阶段，但Web3.0可能会成为打破互联网集权时代的一把利斧。
Web3.0 is still in a state of immature, but Web3.0 may be an ax to break the era of Internet centralization.
是时候建立一个更好的互联网了，这是加密基金风投A16Z最近在Web3.0投资总结中的结尾。
It is time to build a better Internet, which is the end of the recent Web3.0 investment summary of the Encrypted Fund A16Z.
或许也是互联网时代即将进入新一代价值网络的一生呐喊。
Perhaps it is also a lifetime of the Internet age that is about to enter a new generation of value networks.
参考资料：
《连老奶奶都来问的DAO到底是什么？》
《关于WEB3的观点论战，谁动了我的JPEG？》
本文为专栏作者授权创业邦发表，版权归原作者所有。文章系作者个人观点，不代表创业邦立场，转载请联系原作者。如有任何疑问，请联系editor@cyzone.cn。
Please contact the original author at editor@cyzone.cn>.
注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群
打开微信扫一扫
添加客服
进入交流群
发表评论